News comes of more professions taking on vetting – even though they are not required to do so by law. First, the Driving Standards Authority proposed that checks for driving instructors should be made compulsory. The organisation’s chief executive explained his reasoning: ‘Many parents put their trust in instructors to teach their children how to drive, and believe they are in a safe environment. Teachers in schools and playgroups are required to have such checks. I would like to see these checks incorporated as soon as possible so we can protect teenagers and young adults learning to drive.’ This despite the fact…

One American father says that his children’s elementary school is asking parent volunteers to be fingerprinted. What’s interesting about the school’s letter is that fingerprinting is presented as an innocuous service: ‘the Office of Human Resources will provide fingerprinting services…from 9am to 2pm…. [W]e ask that you plan to attend this event. Many of you chaperone field trips, work in classrooms and support the school in other essential ways. We hope this opportunity will facilitate your continued support’. Likewise, Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) checks are often presented as an ‘opportunity’ for which you are ‘eligible’. This soft language suggests that such controlling…

Arun, in West Sussex, has started vetting all its councillors, on the grounds that they are in a ‘position of trust’ and may come into unsupervised contact with children. Yet as one Lib Dem councillor pointed out, the fact that these people are elected means that they are known and trusted in their communities. The authority won through the ballot box surely counts for more than a tick of approval from the CRB. The justification for the policy is not to protect children, but to cover backs. A council officer said: ‘There are situations where councillors may have unaccompanied liaison with children…

Some policy wonk suggested giving lone mothers the right to do CRB checks on potential partners. Several contributors to this Mumsnet discussion site come out against the idea. One says: ‘the idea that you have to produce a certificate proving you’re not an abuser in the field of human relationships…is quite frightening…. It does encourage all of us to be scared of each other.’

Here is an email from Bryan Dedman, from Brentwood, about how child protection rules create problems for a small local church group: ‘I help run The Club at Brentwood Baptist Church. The Club meets on Monday’s and has a membership of about 12, half boys and half girls in the 11 to 14-age range. We just play games, table tennis, pool, playstation and have short talks. Tonight we may have to close for the night. We have 4 leaders but our 2 lady leaders are not available and we cannot meet as we have girls and no female leader on site. If…

In a blog piece, Justin Wyllie from Youth Rights UK discusses the difficulties that paranoia about paedophilia creates for youth workers: ‘Apply for a post as a volunteer youth worker with Islington for example and you will be told “people want to work with children for all sorts of reasons” in a tone that makes it quite clear you are viewed with the utmost suspicion’. He also makes some interesting points about how radical politics depends upon free relations between the generations: ‘The meeting of the older and the younger generation can be a crucible where social values and perceptions are critiqued…

Judith Gillespie from the Scottish Parent Teacher Council submitted evidence to the Scottish Education Committee about the problems with the new vetting legislation. Here are her notes on the meetings. ‘Brian Gorman of Disclosure Scotland was hard-line about supporting vetting but gave a frightening insight into his apparent lack of understanding of the technical IT needs of the system. By the time he had finished describing the information exchange system, I was quietly thinking “and you think that will work?” It was scary stuff and there is a serious need for an IT expert – and someone who knows about security –…